Members 
Search 
Help 
Register 
Login 
Home Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
|
   |
| Which is more accurate? nn2x or no scaler? [message #6954] | Fri, 03 November 2023 23:44 | |||
| ||||
|
Hi all. I'm running FF7 with the goat shader and stretch set to aspect_int. While playing around with the settings I noticed that enabling nn2x resulted in a noticeably cleaner picture: [img]index.php?t=getfile&id=1424&private=0[/img] [img]index.php?t=getfile&id=1426&private=0[/img] I thought this looked nice, but then I found this thread (https://forum.fobby.net/index.php?t=msg&goto=5348&) talking about how distorted pixels are a by-product of how the emulator adheres to the PS1's pixel clock. So what exactly is nn2x doing here to create this cleaner image, and how does it compare to what an actual PS1 would be outputting? The vertical height of my display is only 768 pixels, if that's relevant. I know from the documentation that the goat shader is written for bigger displays, but I'm not sure whether or not that's related to what I'm seeing here. Finally, is there a reason to prefer aspect_mult2 to aspect_int? 
Attachment: Final Fantasy VII (USA) (Disc 1)-0000.png(Size: 78.74KB, Downloaded 51 time(s))
Attachment: Final Fantasy VII (USA) (Disc 1)-0001.png(Size: 282.61KB, Downloaded 44 time(s))
Attachment: Final Fantasy VII (USA) (Disc 1)-0002.png(Size: 66.00KB, Downloaded 43 time(s))
Attachment: Final Fantasy VII (USA) (Disc 1)-0003.png(Size: 199.21KB, Downloaded 40 time(s)) | ||||
| ||||
| |
| Previous Topic: | About frameskip and desktop composition |
| Next Topic: | mednafen error |
]